Sunday, March 09, 2008

The iPhone SDK

"Every once in a while a revolutionary product comes along that changes everything. It's very fortunate if you can work on just one of these in your career. ... Apple's been very fortunate in that it's introduced a few of these."
- Steve Jobs

As a long-time Mac nerd, I've long been eagerly awaiting the software development kit (SDK) for the iPhone and iPod Touch. For those not in the know, this is a piece of software that allows for the development of other software. Currently, the iPhone/iTouch ship with a set of applications (mail, Safari web browser, calendar etc.) and that's all there will ever be. You can use web calendars (like Google Calendar) when you have an internet connection, but you can't install any native applications the way you can on a computer. No games, no fancier word processors, nothing. Well, that's set to change, as the SDK is going to arrive in June. On Thursday, Apple unveiled the details of the SDK (overall analysis here, play-by-play description of the announcement event here), and I'd like to look at what we now know.

Before the event took place (it has been announced for some time that the SDK was coming), I had some questions I wanted answered, regarding the limitations of the SDK, and how applications would be distributed. Most of those questions have now been answered.

VOIP Applications. The iPhone obviously is primarily a voice device-it's a feature-packed phone to be sure, but a phone nonetheless. Further, it's a phone tied to specific network carriers (AT&T in the U.S., O2 in the U.K, Orange in France and T-Mobile in Germany, for example). These carriers have invested billions of dollars into building their infrastructure, and nothing scares them more than VOIP. VOIP stands for Voice Over IP, and is an umbrella term for any technology that allows you to place phone calls over the internet; the most common example is Skype. By treating voice calls as data, these services can realise tremendous savings. For example, while it costs me about 10p-35p/minute to make local calls from my mobile phone, and about £1/minute or more to make international calls, I called some friends in Canada with Skype from my computer and it cost me about 25p for a half hour.

As Wi-Fi internet access proliferates, VOIP becomes even more powerful. Imagine I could use an iPhone, at home, to place Skype calls. If I'm outside the range of my Wi-Fi point, I use the cell network; but if I'm at home, I can call anywhere in the world for a fraction of the cost, and don't have to use any of the minutes I purchase from my mobile carrier. You can understand why they're scared: all of a sudden, I'd be using their expensive network about 10% as much as I do now. So, hearing Apple say they would allow VOIP applications on the iPhone is thrilling.

Verdict: Yay Apple! I know AT&T would probably rather you block VOIP in any way possible, but I look forward to be able to make very cheap calls when in range of a Wi-Fi point.

Software Distribution: Apple has decided that all iPhone apps are to reside on Apple's server, and be downloaded through what they're calling the app store. Free apps will not cost the developer anything for Apple to host (beyond an initial, and quite reasonable $99 for the SDK and developer's club membership) and paid apps will cost the developer 30% of the cost for Apple to host the programs. This differs dramatically from computer software, which can be hosted anywhere, and downloaded at will, and installed manually.

I'm torn on this decision. I was worried they'd require payment for all applications, and am relieved that they will allow free apps. The advantages of this model are that Apple can ensure that no applications contain viruses or any of the other malware that infests computers. Furthermore, they can maintain a certain level of quality control, and if something goes wrong, there is a single source to trace that application back. Finally, it means that there is one location where every piece of iPhone software can be found, making a single, simple solution to software. However, this incurs a fee for any developer wishing to profit from their applications and means there's also a single point of failure if things go wrong. More ominously, perhaps, it means that Apple has final say over what applications are permitted on your iPhone. They've said they'll allow VOIP (as I mentioned before), which indicates they're open to things which their business partners might not be the biggest fans of. However, they've already said, unsurprisingly, that they won't allow SIM-unlocking applications, which would allow iPhones to be used on networks other than AT&T, so clearly they're planning to pick and choose which apps are permitted.

I'm on the fence, because there are clear advantages to this strategy in terms of security, doubly important for this market; I'll accept crashing and freezing on my computer much more readily than on my phone, and a virus that could spread phone-to-phone is a terrifying concept. But Apple has to tread lightly. There are some applications I really want to see on the iPhone, such as a video player that plays all formats, not just H.264, the format Apple uses to sell videos in the iTunes store. This would perhaps hurt iTunes sales, so I wouldn't be shocked if Apple blocked it; but I hope they won't-that would show a penchant for application-filtering I would find disturbing. Similarly, a BitTorrent application, or other peer-to-peer software will provide an acid test; if Apple permits software that not only provides potential alternatives to buying stuff from the iTunes store, but also provides the possibility of being used to pirate movies, I'll know they're open-minded, and will be OK with the iPhone App Store. If they crackdown, I'll know they're intent on auditing my application choices, and will be wary.

Verdict: Wait and see. Will Apple allow applications to exist that could provide revenue-damaging, or potentially illegal activities, or will they enforce a puritanical code of ethics on all iPhones? I hope the former.

SDK Details: The SDK itself looks quite interesting (though keep in mind, I'm not a software developer, so I might be missing something). I think the $99 fee is reasonable-Microsoft's Visual Studio and MSDN access cost scads more, and the fee appears to be a one-time-only affair. I like that the SDK can access the positioning information, allowing the iPhone to tell you where it is geographically, using cellular tower and Wi-Fi HotSpot data. The iPhone simulator seems an excellent way to test one's applications before downloading them onto a real-world iPhone. And ultimately, it seems like Apple has finally embraced the reality that the iPhone isn't just a phone, it's a phone new portable computing platform. I can't wait to see what applications emerge in the coming months. I just might have to make an iPod Touch-sized dent in my bank account one of these days...


"My children - in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

-Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Turkey

"No matter how rich and prosperous, a nation without independence, cannot be subject to any behaviour before the humanity, at a higher level than serving."
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk


This past August, I was in Turkey, and I'm long overdue for a report on what went on and my thoughts on the whole shindig. It was an exciting and revelatory experience for me in many ways. Incidentally, sorry for this taking so long-pure laziness has made it so long overdue, the original writing date was last September. Sigh.

I was in Istanbul for the European Universities Debating Championship (EUDC) 2007 (Aug 5-11), hosted by Koç University. But since I'd never been to Turkey, and had heard nothing but positive comments about it, I extended my trip by about a week before and after, to allow for some travel. I was there from July 31-Aug 17.

I arrived in Istanbul with Dan and Hannah; we met Shannon at the airport, and Julia joined us a half-hour later, also at the airport. We cabbed it into our hostel in Sultanahmet, the most tourist-heavy section of Istanbul, and also the section with some of the most beautiful sites-The Blue Mosque, Hagia Sophia and Grand Bazaar, to name but a few.

We spent the first day hitting the major tourist attractions, i.e. those noted above. I cannot emphasise enough how stunningly gorgeous the Blue Mosque (pictured below at night, from the rooftop bar in our youth hostel) and Hagia Sophia are. The Blue Mosque, especially, revels in its intricacy and beauty. I've long been a fan of the ornate, ancient cathedrals of Europe, and I am no hard-pressed to decide between the two genres of religious buildings. In either case, the tapestries, decorations, altars and mosaics and phenomenal. The Hagia Sophia has a slightly more austere look, possibly due to its age, possibly due to its conversion into a mosque from its original design as a cathedral, followed by its conversion into a museum. However, the dones and courtyards, and the expansive inner atrium all speak to a devotion to the almighty that I find equally understandable and inconceivable.


The Grand Bazaar, on the other hand, impressed me less. Though it certainly bore the thriving, vibrant air of bargaining and hustling I'd been lead to expect, I was disappointed at the repetitiveness and cheapness of the merchandise. This clearly is not where Turks come to shop, but rather where they relieve clueless tourists of their money. Chess sets, carpets and fake clothes/watches/handbags abound, oft-repeated from one stall to the next. Haggling is a must, and as it is a skill I lack, I most certainly was taken for a ride on the few items I did choose to purchase. I think I'll stick to eBay from now on. Inexplicably, I'd end up back at the bazaar at least three more times over the course of my trip. Go figure.

After this, we met up with Rosie and planned the next phase of our trip: Gallipoli. Dan had found out about a tour to Gallipoli, the area of Turkey in which allied forces (Dan's grandfather included) landed during the first world war. The tour we elected to go on was a two-day, all-inclusive affair; they included a bus trip to Channakale, a guided bus tour of the war sites and grave sites, a night in a local youth hostel and (the highlight of the trip), SCUBA diving down to WW1 wrecks.

As with all such war-memorial tours I've taken, this one was quite humbling. The territory was breathtakingly beautiful, from the azure ocean to the vibrant hillsides. To look out over such expanses and think of young men clawing their way up amidst machine-gun fire, to think of people spilling blood to either seize or defend such beautiful territory and the dominion of those who resided on it, is a shocking indictment of humanity.

The SCUBA diving was great, even though I got badly sunburned (due in part to my policy of staying out far too long because of my long-standing and never-successful policy of "if I'm not pink now, I never will be, right?" and due partly to Julia's sabotage of my lower back suntan lotion application.) We were cut somewhat short for time due to a few technical glitches early on, but I still got to go down and see a sunken desalinisation vessel. Apparently, the Turks had retrofitted a whaling boat to desalinate the sea water and provide fresh water for the troops. The thinking was that the allied ships wouldn't sink a civilian boat. This worked for awhile, until one of the allied warships finally asked the question "wait a minute! There aren't whales for thousands of miles, why do you need a whaling boat?", after which it was promptly sunk. This was my first time SCUBA-diving and I therefore had to stick close to the dive master, but it was a great experience. Once you get used to breathing through the regulator, the feeling of weightlessness really is amazing, and it was a great way to experience a small piece of history.

The next week was filled with debating, and I won't bore everyone with the details (all two of you who read this blog, anyway). Suffice it to say, it was filled with fun, merriment, pretension, drinking, socialising, catching up with old friends, meeting new friends, debating, debating and more debating, some more drinking, some wonderful buffets and some great parties. Koç put on an absolutely flawless tournament; from the food to the socials to the debating, everything was done to the highest standards and executed brilliantly. They are bidding for the world championships in 2010, and I hope they get it. Dan and I did alright at the tournament, but were disappointed by our early performance, which relegated us to some less-than-spectacular rooms later on. Highlights of the tournament for me were the night-time boat cruise of the Bosphorus river, the final round being held in a 5th century Byzantine cathedral, and the post-final clubbing in all our over-dressed, sweaty geekiness. You haven't lived until you've seen 200 debaters in a small, hot club in suits and ties, pretending they know how to dance.


After that, my plan had been to go to Safranbolu (a city in the north of Turkey that's generally out of the way and supposedly quite nice, old and quaint) for a day or so, then spend a few days in the Cappadocia region in the south, specifically hoping to solo-hike the length of the Ilhara Valley. However, after a solid week of debating, I was pretty worn out, and decided to spend a day at the beach, and doing some lounging around with various debaters at the university (which had a lovely pool). Both of these were nice and relaxing, and got my batteries well recharged; however, the lost time impinged on my other plans, and I had to scrap Safranbolu completely. In the end, though I greatly enjoyed the pool and beach time I had, I wish I'd been better organised about my travel plans; alas, it just gives me that much more to see on the next visit. And I did still get to see Cappadocia, which had been one of must-sees, and was a sublime experience.


Cappadocia, a region in the south of Turkey, is the centre of Turkey Christianity; for this reason, it is veritably littered with scores of ancient churches, frescoes and temples. What's fascinating about the region, however, is not that it is the epicentre of Christianity for the Turks; rather it is the unique landscapes and geological formations, and the resultant ways of life that took root there, creating environs that exist nowhere else and sit as monuments to austere beauty and workmanship. The central and preeminent feature of Cappadocia is the so-called "fairy chimneys" (pictured above). I won't go into detail about how these were formed, if you are curious, check out this brief Wikipedia article. Basically, ancient Turks can across these fairy chimneys and decided that they'd made great adobes. Therefore, the carved intricate, often multi-storey houses into the chimneys, and into many of the surrounding caves. They had windows, different rooms for different purposes, churches and more. The basically developed an entire society centred around the local geological formations. Interestingly, a few of these fairy chimneys are still inhabited, with some even being for sale.

This gives Cappadocia the feel of two very strong bits of fictional imagery: Bedrock City (from the Flintstones) and Tatooine (from Star Wars). Seeing dozens of caves (and pigeon coops) nestled into the windswept hills evokes both cultural images. I spent my time in Cappadocia both exploring on my own and on an organised tour. The open-air museum in Goreme features some of the most intricate fairy chimney abodes and many churches, and I spent a late morning/early afternoon perusing the museum. I then went off on my own, hiking through the nearby valley of swords, which contained a collection of smaller lumps, many of which were carved out, but the mority of them long since abandoned, and often eroded somewhat. It was tranquil and lovely, and when I crested the hill edging the valley, I could see down below a series of fields and what appeared to be some inhabited fairy chimneys. It was a scene of utter peace and exuded a sense of harmony. To enjoy the settings, I picked a cave carved into one of the lump-shaped abandoned mini-fairy chimneys and just read for several hours (Anil's Ghost for those that are curious, an amazingly descriptive work I'd highly recommend).
I also wrote some postcards, and may have napped for a short while. It was a lovely respite; while I enjoy an always-moving, see-everything-yo-can trip as well, there's something nice about just finding a shady, but still hot area, and relaxing completely.

The guided tour I did was of an underground city and a hike along the Ihhara Valley. The underground city, built millennia ago, and originally designed to house as many as 50,000 inhabitants. It was designed as a security feature, and was generally uninhabited. The idea was, the community would live in the city above, but if they were ever attacked, they could retreat to the underground city for refuge. The main access was through a narrow stairwell opening into a large chamber, thus allowing for an easy defence against any interlopers who might try to take over the city from above.

The Ihlara valley hike was quite possibly one of the most breathtaking walks I've ever taken. Cut through sandstone hills (with caves and churches carved into them at frequent intervals), the Ihlara Valley is a swath of lust foliage and a beautiful river amid the arid environs typical to that part of Anatolia. Pristine and dripping with a sense of history and grandeur, the valley is as yet not completely overrun by tourists, though they are plentiful. The hike takes about four hours, and you can hear the babbling of the river besides you at all times, while gazing up at the cliff face, in which thousands of people once lived, prayed and thrived. It's a truly unique locale, and although I was initially wary of taking a guided tour rather than going on my own, I'm glad that I did-it gave me a chance to see more than I would have otherwise, and the experience was wonderful. That night, I went out with some Canadians from the youth hostel in which I was staying (which, incidentally was built into a cave, very cool indeed) for an organised night of traditional Turkish dancing, food and wine. Very fun.

After that, I took the long bus ride back to Istanbul, where I stayed for a night before flying back to Manchester. The experience, I think it's fair to say, left me in some awe. Turkey is a fascinating country, and one about which I wish I knew more, and one to which I definitely aspire to return some day. Turkey is a country that is overwhelmingly Muslim, yet officially secular. It's a country that is the gateway between Europe and the Middle East, and that encompasses both a diverse and proud history, and a modern bent. All of this is reflect in many aspects of Turkey, but doubly so in Istanbul itself.

In Istanbul, it is a common sight to see a 1500-year-old mosque cloistered next to a modern glass office building. Markets and bazaars coexist with electronics shops and cellular phone providers. The country's religiosity is evident in the existence of the (technically banned) headscarves worn by many women, yet the secularism that is bound in law is obvious, in the bohemian, party atmosphere of the night life and the modernity of dress. There are, of course, factions that think this movement has happened too quickly-the recent election of the AK party, though tempered by the military, has shown that there are many who object to the banning of religious icons in public. Turkey clashes with its ethnic Kurdish people demonstrate the tensions that exist within this frequently conquered state, once subjugated by the Ottoman empire, among others.


Turkey seems to stand at a crossroads, disparate views stretching forth in front of it. The minarets of mosques that are visible throughout show its adherence to its Islamic roots, yet Turkey's on-again-off-again desire to join the European Union has brought about changes to its human rights and social welfare policies that are more in line with liberal democracies. The appeals of each seems to be divergent, yet the Turkish people seem to handle this internal conflict with comparative aplomb, the glittering skylines and traditional architecture a monument to the republic that Ataturk crated, forged in the crucible of the first world war. Whether they embrace the traditional roots, mired in the past, adherent to religious teachings and traditional values, or embrace the modernity offered by the western world, with its potential pitfalls in economics and the often-implied loss of individuality and morality, is still to be decided. Whichever road Turkey takes, a culture so strong, so proud and so deserving on unity and preservation seems unlikely to disappear into the miasma of sameness so prevalent in other parts of the world. As part of the EU, or as an independent nation, Turkey will always be Turkey: hot, beautiful, austere and traditional; giving, exciting, modern and
dynamic. As the office towers continue to sprout, the dily calls to prayer from the Blue Mosque will no doubt echo into the evening's gloom, a haunting testament to the well-deserved pride of Turkish people, and their strength.

Following the military triumph we accomplished by bayonets, weapons and blood, we shall strive to win victories in such fields as culture, scholarship, science and economics.
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

Friday, January 18, 2008

65 Percent Perfect

So, according to that greatest bastion of journalist integrity, the Daily Mail, there is a list of 20 attributes that women find ideal in a guy. All told, I think I come out OK. Here's the list:
  1. At least 5'10". Yup, 6'0" to be exact.
  2. Good-looking. A matter of opinion of course, but don't think I can give myself the nod for this one. I'm not bad-looking, but neither am I fending off the "world's most beautiful people" award requests. Average-looking is a more suitable descriptor, I'd say.
  3. 12.5 stone. That's about 175lbs or 80kg for those of you living in countries that don't use such outdated units of measurement. Also well below my current weight; I'm about 14.5stone/200lbs/92kg at the moment.
  4. Earns more than £30,000. Um, no, sadly the life of a student doesn't entail 30grand salaries. Soon enough, though, I should easily be in this range.
  5. Blue eyes. Yup
  6. Short, dark-brown hair. Indeed; very short at the moment, actually.
  7. Medium build. I might be a little on the large side of medium, but I think I can still qualify.
  8. BA degree. I'm going to give myself the points for this, even though I have a B.Sc., because the article elucidates it somewhat by saying that it's a university education that's valued, rather than specifically the B.A. and I'm the process of going for my Ph.D., so I have no dearth of university education. Plus, chicks dig engineers right? Right? Anybody?
  9. Never been married. Another point for me.
  10. No children. Nope, no children here.
  11. Three previous serious relationships. Well, only one really. A second that could've been had the situation been different, but I'd really have to push the definition of "serious" to be able to count three.
  12. Clean-shaven. After much persuasion, I bid adieu about a year and a half ago to the goatee I sported in undergrad, so yes, I am back to being smooth and baby-faced.
  13. Drives silver Mercedes. If by "silver Mercedes" you mean "black bicycle", then yes. But realistically, probably not.
  14. Enjoys cinema. Even though I haven't been out as much as I'd like of late, going to the cinema is one of my favourite pastimes.
  15. Likes eating out. Ignoring the obvious double entendre here, I don't like cooking, and do enjoy a wide variety of well-prepared food. Though I don't eat out often, that's a financial decision (see #4), not a prefernce. I love dining out.
  16. Has had few than six sexual partners. Well, this one's a little personal, so let's just skip to the next question.
  17. Owns a £300,000 home. Can we just assume I'm going to lose points on any of the characteristics related to actually having money?
  18. Doesn't smoke. I hate cigarette smoke, and-at 27 years old-have never even smoked a single cigarette.
  19. Dislikes football. True for either American football or actual football (a.k.a. soccer). Sports are just not my cup of tea. The only potential exceptions are quite rare-an odd game of hockey perhaps, a little baseball from time to time and Olympic women's beach volleyball.
  20. Likes pets. I was always a cat person when I was a kid, but am increasingly a dog person. I'd love to have either, but sadly my current living situation (a tiny two-bedroom apartment whose residents aren't home between 9AM and 7PM every day and have no money for vet bills etc) is hardly conducive to a happy puppy. But I get the points for this, because I do love pets.
The article specifies a few other things where I might score some bonus points as well. Specifically, the "wacky" sense of humour. I think I can lay claim to that (sometimes bordering on juvenile and/or offensive, but wacky nonetheless). Also, being a cuddly lover. And finally, apparently some women are looking for men who are starting to bald (although the example given is Bruce Willis, which is a pretty high bar to clear. After all, I've never managed to drive a big-ass truck across a collapsing highway while fleeing an F35 Joint Strike Fighter and shouting epithets and witty one-liners).

So, there you go. From the 20-point list, I score a solid 65%, with a few that are liable to get checked off within the first few years of me finishing my degree and actually locating a salary. Not bad eh? Ladies, you know how to reach me. After posting this, I can only imagine the come-ons will start pouring in!

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Dating CV

"Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again."
- Franklin P. Jones

Why do we write a CV (curriculum vitae)? To chronicle our experience, in the hopes of conveying our skills, ability and knowledge to potential future employers. A CV (a.k.a. résumé in North America) is a short description of how we want the working world to view us. We list what we can do, and the experience it took to gain such skills, and provide references on request. This cannot give a perfect picture of us as an employee, but certainly creates an image for the people who need to evaluate our suitability.

I think we need to extend this concept to the realm of dating. After all, dating is one of the areas of our lives that has the greatest bearing on our personal happiness, and yet it's basically a crapshoot. We go on dates to learn about the other person, but from the get-go we know next to nothing about them; we essentially choose randomly for something that is intrinsic to our personal contentment. Maybe it's time to start culling the herd before we leap into the fray of dating.

Just as in the job market, there is no "perfect" CV. Different skills are required for different jobs, and different attributes apply to different people. But we cannot gauge the attributes of a potential suitor until it's too late and we're dating them. What if we could pre-filter "applicants" by looking for those with skills we desire? You want someone who knows how to cook? That had better be on their CV. Prefer to date only short (or tall, thin, fat, whatever) partners? Why not have that listed right up front? It wouldn't guarantee a match, but might boost your odds.

Of course, this removes some of the spontaneity, the joy inherent in discovering the attributes that make up your partner; truly this is one of the best things about the early stages of dating, you feel like an intrepid explorer charting new territory. But this joy is tempered with a major risk of failure-you might find out something that's an absolute deal-breaker in your view, something that with adequate warning could have been noted before any risk of heartbreak. This is already done to a degree by those engaging in online dating sites: when you get a list of a potential date's likes, dislikes and more, you are already filtering people based on your criteria. So why not formalise the concept?

Of course, getting references might be tricky. How can you expect an honest reference from an ex if the relationship ended badly? Though you might have many wonderful qualities, the enmity they feel since your breakup could forever colour their feelings. And of course, like any other CV, people will stretch the truth. "I can make a frozen pizza" suddenly becomes "I have an affinity for and exemplary skill in Italian cuisine".

Who knows? Maybe one day we'll enact this, and we'll soon enough see couples on the dance floors of popular clubs, exchanging two-page CVs detailing the highlights of their dating abilities. Past partners will be called for references, and we will weigh up all those who seek our affection. After a thorough, yet expedient evaluative process, we will contact the successful applicant, and they can begin their training. And what's more romantic than bringing mindless corporate logic and efficiency to the world of dating?

So, please use the comments section below to post what you would put on your dating CV.

NOTE: If you have taken this post with even the slightest wisp of seriousness, please write the word "sarcasm" on a cricket bat and apply it forcibly and repeatedly to your forehead. Consider this holiday goofiness at it's best. I ultimately just want a way to brag about my back massaging skills.
"Love is the answer, but while you're waiting for the answer, sex raises some pretty interesting questions."
- Woody Allen

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Bizarre bike stuff theft

"A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who hasn't sufficient capital to form a company."
- Howard Scott


It's almost a rite of passage in Manchester to get your bike stolen, a rite in which I fortunately have yet to participate. My friend and flatmate Dan, combined with his prior flatmate Jono, have had six bikes and one rear wheel stolen in the past two years. My friend Mike has had a shocking eight bikes stolen in the last 15 months. And my friend Liz has had at least two stolen, possibly more. Needless to say, they have contributed well to the scuzzy section of Manchester's society. I have so far been spared, due in no small way to how little I ride my bike around town, and the fact that I have always stored it within my flat.

However, I have had my first brush with bike theft since coming to Manchester, but in a bizarre and baffling way. You see, while my bike was locked up outside of the Stopford building last Tuesday (while I was in for debating and then the post-debate pub), some punk stole some of the stuff from my bike. Specifically, he stole the rear mudguard and light, and my two water bottles. In and of itself, not that strange, but only odd once you consider what was required to do so.

You see, I recently bought a security cable. This 8-foot-long woven steel cable allows me to lock up my front wheel and wrap it around my seat, thus avoiding me needing to remove those two things. In addition, I can now lock my helmet to my bike. The end result is that I spend and extra minute or two locking up my bike, but I no longer have to haul my seat and helmet with me. I used to carry the water bottles as well, but gave up figuring they were too worthless to bother stealing. Silly me.

Anyway, this still doesn't make it weird. What makes it weird is that I can't loop the security cable through my seat, so I wrap it around the post a few times, over and under the mudguard, hopefully making it enough of a pain to get off to not make it worthwhile. The light and the mudguard both attached to the seat post. What this means is that the thieves wiggled the cable loose enough to get the seat out, pulled the seat out of the bike, thus freeing the cable. They then took the mudguard and light (original retail value combined £25 or so) and replaced the seat. The seat isn't worth a lot, but probably more than the rest combined. The light had a half-broken clip, and the mudguard was filthy. The water bottles were old and scratched. So their net benefit from this was maybe £5, if they were lucky. But the seat probably could have sold for £10 or more. So why not take it?

As I see it, there are usually two reasons for theft like this:
  1. Make money. Well, obviously, it's not that. Like I say, the seat was the most expensive thing they removed, and they put it back. They also overlooked the tire pump, though it's black and was obscured somewhat by the security cable, so maybe they just didn't notice that). Even if the seat weren't worth more, it's worth something, so why not take it?
  2. Vandalism. This pisses me off more than theft, but some people will steal or destroy things just because they like to cause harm to others. But again, in this case, why not take the seat? It'll certainly piss me off more to have to ride home without a seat and to have to replace this more-expensive item. Even if you (as the thief) don't keep it, just toss it in the bin; I'll still be equally annoyed.
So, what is the explanation? The only thing I can possibly come up with, is some guy passing by on his bike said to himself "boy, it sure is dark and wet, and I'm really thirsty! I wish I had a light to make me more visible, a mudguard to keep my butt dry and some water bottles to slake my thirst. Hmmmmmmm.... I have an idea!" If not this, I have no idea why someone would pass on the seat. It could be that they just wanted to cram what they could fit into a backpack for easy transport, but the mudguard is far longer than the seat. So who knows? Anyone have any ideas?

I'm baffled. Also a little pissed that I now need to buy a second mudguard in as many weeks. I guess I'll have to find a way to more-securely lock up my seat.

Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live.
-Mark Twain